James Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>

@Voice : Facebook Post -- Intentions to File Complaint with Denver County District Attorney's Office --- re: #ConspiracyExposed in Denver HIv/AIDS Housing and HIV/AIDS Social Services Sources of Hate and Harassment An Embarassment to the Denver HIV/AIDS Community As whole --- hater and discrimination has been allowed to win!

Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:29 AM
To: MessageResend-IntentionsToFileComplaintWithDenverCountyDistrictAttorneysOffice@realuphuman.net
Cc: Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, Shannon Southall <shannon@rockymountaincares.org>, "Shannon Southall [ @FuckedUpHuman.net ]" <srsouthall@gmail.com>
Received an Message Delivery Error --- Message Size To Large in my delivery to Cinamon Romeo and Shannon Southall.
Therefore I have reduced the attached images --- hopefully that will reduce the message size into compliant tolerance. 
Please continue to read.....

If this still receives an error, this email has been hard-copy printed and certified mail delivery confirmation sent via USPS postal mail.

This email will be public web archived in the following online directories:






---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: @Voice : Facebook Post -- Intentions to File Complaint with Denver County District Attorney's Office --- re: #ConspiracyExposed in Denver HIv/AIDS Housing and HIV/AIDS Social Services Sources of Hate and Harassment An Embarassment to the Denver HIV/AIDS Community As whole --- hater and discrimination has been allowed to win!
To: Denver District Attorney’s Office <info@denverda.org>, Chief Executive Officer Darrell J Vigil MBA <darrell.vigil@coloradohealthnetwork.org>
Cc: Cinamon 'The Spice Of Life To Makes Nice' Romeo <cinamon@rockymountaincares.org>, Darrell Johnson <Darrell.Johnson1@q.com>, Jennifer Mattock <jmattock@pillar.biz>, Jamie Villalobos <jamie.villalobos@coloradohealthnetwork.org>, Angela Keady <angelak@coloradohealthnetwork.org>, Shannon Southall <shannon@rockymountaincares.org>


Dear Denver County District Attorney's Office :

I have a conspiracy charge against 4 separate organizations in collusion and 6 individually named persons.

It is my intention to file a complex story that will require additional investigations.  .   What this conspiracy of events will show, a goal point targeted effort to bring forward a successful eviction, that did occur in November even though the process was forecast in July that was carried through.   Because this process had been used in my previous experiences of an eviction case from 2006 in HIV/AIDS housing in Oakland CA. 

With this forecast story casting created in an email to case management and building managements, in July --- the systemic planned attack against me, as a community member must be brought forward in complaint.  IT IS MY INTENTION to be TREATED as SERIOUSLY HARMED but RECONCILABLE ---- and with a reconciliation settlement already placed forward into perspective  [ as copied to a project non-profit called ItGetsBetterProject about Gay Youth Suicide Prevention, that would be the preferred outcome.

It is by the informational hemorrhaging of employee to employer reviews at Glassdoor against Colorado Health Network that reflects the wrong doing that was posted and placed two weeks following my leaving town after this eviction and a 5 month rental apartment sharing with a friend residency trying to get attention to the obvious conspiracy exposed, first obviously internally exposed to be sourced from internal of my tenancy control leaderships, in October. of 2016 where the process was written about in July and the court filing complaint was made on November 30th 2016.  I had not yet had a targeted person finger pointed.... just a oddity of linking tied circumstances of suspicion.   But that will change on June 6th 2017 and July 5th 2017 with events directly involving the staff at Colorado Health Network and my usage of Facebook live to document these events of happenstance.

So on July 6th is where I name the puppeteer of this 11 month hate and harassment targeted against me campaign to be the second tier director leadership of Colorado Health Network Mr Jamie Villalobos, Regional Director [ 2nd from the top ].  The top executive director I am not sure is internal involved of conspiracy or just outside the informed conspiracy actions.  

It was on July 14th 2017 when I invited executive director Darrell Vigil at my expense for a horse ride at the Jefferson County Park Stables located at:




When Mr Vigil Failed To Arrive For This planned talking situation affair that I planned the day before with park staff in my story telling of events that I was there spending my days in the park resting in my car till dusk.  I told the staff that I planned this horse ride for the next day and if it would not be any trouble that I expected the executive director to not show up, that I could get a picture of me occupying a saddle of one horse and an empty riding saddle for the invited party.   That picture was made.





That picture was taken July 14th 2017 after Mr Vigil failed to show up for this planned talking out discussion and horse ride affair.

It was not until July 28th 2017 that the very first Glassdoor negative perspective and outlook employee to employer review was posted and placed on Glassdoor.


Helpful (1)

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
Doesn't Recommend
Negative Outlook

I have been working at Colorado Health Network full-time (Less than a year)

Pros

Brand new facility, friendly coworkers, easy access to downtown. Interviews are too easy. Great benefits. Benefits those less fortunate.

Cons

Oppressive leadership, disingenuous management, dishonest business practices. I really wan to like this place but the management could use some training. I have witnessed some dishonest business practices going on here. Toxic work environment. Pay is very low. Upper level management is very elitist, discriminating, and oppressive toward other staff.

Advice to Management

Take some training courses to learn how to perform your job better. Many may have landed in their current positions due to the Peter Principle. Do some house cleaning, see who actually contributes to the successful functioning of the company and trim the fat. Just because someone is fun outside of work and makes you laugh does not mean they are competent managers that need to be leading other people. Take a look in the mirror.

There are 2 more negative perspective reviews and 4 total reviews available at the above link, recopied here for your use:


-----

Realizing that Glassdoor has this article referencing criminal investigations, this could be an expensive venture for the county as well as for the organizations and individuals involved.  It would be best to follow through with my reconciliation settlement that I propose --- that I will only accept this settlement arrangement.  I will not place that settlement arrangement stipulations in this document here.  We can talk about it when I arrive in town on the to visit your office and file this case in person on June 6th 2018. 

Thank you,

Mr James M. Driskill
3260 Grande Vista
San Bernardino CA 92405
909-882-8759




The Case Of Glassdoor And The Grand Jury Subpoena, And How Courts Are Messing With Online Speech In Secret

from the it-ain't-so-grand dept

In my last post, I discussed why it is so important for platforms to be able to speak about the discovery demands they receive, seeking to unmask their anonymous users. That candor is crucially important in ensuring that unmasking demands can't damage the key constitutional right to speak anonymously, without some sort of check against their abuse.

The earlier post rolled together several different types of discovery instruments (subpoenas, warrants, NSLs, etc.) because to a certain extent it doesn't matter which one is used to unmask an anonymous user. The issue raised by all of them is that if their power to unmask an anonymous user is too unfettered, then it will chill all sorts of legitimate speech. And, as noted in the last post, the ability for a platform receiving an unmasking demand to tell others it has received it is a critical check against unworthy demands seeking to unmask the speakers behind lawful speech.

The details of each type of unmasking instrument do matter, though, because each one has different interests to balance and, accordingly, different rules governing how to balance them. Unfortunately, the rules that have evolved for any particular one are not always adequately protective of the important speech interests any unmasking demand necessarily affects. As is the case for the type of unmasking demand at issue in this post: a federal grand jury subpoena.

Grand jury subpoenas are very powerful discovery instruments, and with good reason: the government needs a powerful weapon to be able to investigate serious crimes. There are also important constitutional reasons for why we equip grand juries with strong investigatory power, because if charges are to be brought against people, it's important for due process reasons that they have been brought by the grand jury, as opposed to a more arbitrary exercise of government power. Grand juries are, however, largely at the disposal of government prosecutors, and thus a grand jury subpoena essentially functions as a government unmasking demand. The ability to compel information via a grand jury subpoena is therefore not a power we can allow to exist unchecked.

Which brings us to the story of the grand jury subpoena served on Glassdoor, which Paul Levy and Ars Technica wrote about earlier this year. It's a story that raises three interrelated issues: (1) a poor balancing of the relevant interests, (2) a poor structural model that prevented a better balancing, and (3) a gag that has made it extraordinarily difficult to create a better rule governing how grand jury subpoenas should be balanced against important online speech rights.

Glassdoor is a platform focused on hosting user-provided information about employers. Much of the speech it hosts is necessarily contributed anonymously so that the speakers can avoid any fallout from their candor. This is the sort of fallout that, if they had to incur it, would discourage them from contributing information others might find valuable. The seriousness of these sorts of consequences is why the district court decision denying Glassdoor's attempts to resist the grand jury subpoena seeking to unmask their users reflects such a poor balancing of the relevant interests. Perhaps if the subpoena had been intended to unmask people the government believed were themselves guilty of the crime being investigated, the balance might have tipped more in favor of enforcing it. But the people who the subpoena was seeking to unmask were simply suspected as possibly knowing something about the crime that others were apparently committing. It is not unreasonable for the government to want to be able to talk to witnesses, but that desire to talk to them is not the only interest present here. These are people who were simply availing themselves of their right to speak anonymously, and who, if this subpoena is enforced, are going to be shocked to suddenly find the government on their doorstep wanting to talk to them.

This sort of unmasking is chilling to them and anyone else who might want to speak anonymously because it means that there's no way they ever will be able to speak should their speech happen to ever somehow relate (however tangentially) to someone else's criminal behavior. It is also inconsistent with the purported goal of fighting crime because it will prevent criminal behavior from coming to light in the first place, for few will want to offer up information if it will only tempt trouble for them at some point in the future.

This mis-balancing of interests is almost a peripheral issue in this case, however. The more significant structural concern is why such a weak balancing test was used. As discussed previously, in order to protect the ability to speak anonymously online, it is important for a platform to be able to resist demands to unmask their users in cases where the reason for the unmasking does not substantially outweigh the need to protect people's right to speak anonymously online. But the district court denied Glassdoor's attempt to resist the subpoena when it chose to apply the test from Branzburg v. Hayes, a Supreme Court case focused on the ability to resist a grand jury subpoena. Branzburg, however, has nothing to do with the Internet or Internet platforms. It is a case from the 1970s that was solely focused on whether the First Amendment gave journalists the right to resist a grand jury subpoena. Ultimately it decided that they generally had no such right, at least so long as the government was not shown to be acting in bad faith, which, while not nothing, is not a standard that is particularly protective of anonymity. It also barely even addressed the interests of the confidential sources themselves, dismissing their interest in maintaining anonymity as a mere "preference," and one the Court presumed was being sought only to shield themselves from prosecution for their own criminal culpability.

The upshot of Branzburg is that the journalist, as an intermediary for a source's information, had no right to resist a grand jury subpoena. Unfortunately, Branzburg simply can't be extended to the online world where, for better or worse, essentially all speech must be intermediated by some sort of platform or service in order to happen. The need to let the platforms resist grand jury subpoenas therefore has less to do with whether an intermediary itself has a right to resist them and everything to do with the the right of their users to speak anonymously, which, far from being a preference, is an affirmative right the Supreme Court, after Branzburg, subsequently recognized.

A better test, and one that respects the need to maintain this critical speech right, is therefore needed, which is why Glassdoor appealed the district court's ruling. Unfortunately, its appeal has raised a third issue: while there is often a lot of secrecy surrounding a grand jury investigation, in part because it makes sense to keep the subject of an investigation in the dark, preserving that level of secrecy does not necessarily require keeping absolutely everything related to the subpoena under seal. Fortunately the district court (and the DOJ, who agreed to this) recognized that some information could safely be released, particularly related to Glassdoor's challenge of the subpoena's enforcement generally, and thanks to that limited unsealing we can tell that the case involved a misapplication of Branzburg to an Internet platform.

Unfortunately the Ninth Circuit didn't agree to this limited disclosure and sealed the entirety of Glassdoor's appeal, even the parts that were already made public. The effects of this sealing included that it became impossible for potential amici to weigh in in support of Glassdoor and to argue for a better rule that would allow platforms to better protect the speech rights of their users. While Glassdoor had been ably litigating the case, the point of amicus briefs is to help the court see the full implications of a particular ruling on interests beyond those immediately before it, which is a hard thing for the party directly litigating to do itself. The reality is that Glassdoor is not the first, and will not be the last, platform to get a grand jury subpoena, but unless the rules governing platforms' ability to resist are stronger than what's afforded by Branzburg, the privacy protection speakers have depended on will continue to evaporate should their speech ever happen to capture the interest of a federal prosecutor with access to grand jury.

For all we know, of course, the Ninth Circuit might have seen its point and quashed the subpoena. Or maybe it upheld it and maybe the FBI has now unpleasantly surprised those Glassdoor users. We may never know, just as we may never know if there are other occasions where courts have used specious reasoning to allow grand jury subpoenas to strip speakers of their anonymity. Even if the Ninth Circuit indeed fixed the problems with this questionable attempt at unmasking, by doing it in secret it's missed an important opportunity to provide guidance to lower courts to help ensure that they don't allow other questionable attempts to keep happening to speakers in the future.



My Name Is Martin Driskill.

---------

I am requesting that everyone now refer to me by my middle name as my primary name is reference to my peace building efforts in relation to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

I was born on September 1st 1965 in San Bernardino CA,
By given real legal given at birth is
James [ First ]  Martin [ Middle ]   Driskill [ Last ]

I was of the fetal age of 3 months when the history of race relations in the United States historical events.

Selma to Montgomery March (1965)




On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Martin J. Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com> wrote:


Denver District Attorney’s Office

Address:
201 W. Colfax Avenue
8th Floor
Denver, CO 80202
Email Address: info@denverda.org
Fax Number: 720-913-9035

From James Martin Driskill, Former Resident of Chesney Klienjohn Apartments 1005 Washington Street, Apt 112 Denver Colorado
Unlawful Business Practices Resulting To Filing Of Illegal Eviction Case #2016C70601 filed on November 30th 2016 in HIV/AIDS Housing on November 30th 2016, World Aids Day Eve.

Intent to File Criminal Complaint Against the HIV/AIDS Denver Flagship Agency, Colorado Health Network for #ConspiracyExposed and collusion of conspirators and cyber-stocking of online activities and invasions of privacy involving those lawful online activities.

Please don't DENY THIS CASE from being filed and brought forward --- The Haters Have Been Allowed To Win --- Time For A Course Correction.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Real Up Human [.net] <realuphuman.net@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, May 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM
Subject: @Voice : Facebook Post -- Intentions to File Complaint with Denver County District Attorney's Office --- re: #ConspiracyExposed in Denver HIv/AIDS Housing and HIV/AIDS Social Services Sources of Hate and Harassment An Embarassment to the Denver HIV/AIDS Community As whole --- hater and discrimination has been allowed to win!
To: voice@gruwup.net, James Driskill <inthemindway@gmail.com>
Cc: Rachel #Kramobone L Griffin <rachel@thslawfirm.com>



Read in full.  This will be web archived and provided spoken voice text narrative translation of this text along side the written text copy.

Image may contain: text

If you call yourself my buddy, friend, or family; hit like; say hi, share this to your status, watch no one follows direction.  


LikeShow more reactions
Comment

Sister of Significant Other X Boyfriend Joy Badwound who is mentioned in many of the online documentation of record by email address. 
Comments
Melody Badwound-Wright
LikeShow more reactions
· Reply · 1h
James M Driskill
James M Driskill Which am I to you.... Buddy? Friend? Family?

Since JB decided to cut the tie of relationship between us, in view of distrust of money factors on the VerizonWireless account, for which I had already put into sms writing, email writing, my intentions.
.. he goes off on accusing me of stiffing him for the remaining balance of my phone device. > $300 in which I told him that I would pay off the balance of the phone but would not pay any premature disconnect member fee because I had already told him the story of what had happened to me in social services..... I.E. Denver Colorado AIDS Project-DCAP vs Client #12153 even though he did not believe my story.

No family, not even my mother truly had placed the outrageous actors of the Colorado Health Network and the 11 month hate and harassment campaign that I was bearing witness through and documenting it as best as I could. Through the dates of April 2015 [ Move Into Denver Date ]

Into Chesney Kleinjohn Apartments Chesney-Kleinjohn Apartments Chesney-Kleinjohn Housing Inc ] through the seriousness of my car being stolen in January of 2016, the very hateful sms conversation of George Mark Adsit [ http://fuckeduphuman.net/.../%23FuckedUpHumanGeyserAssholes/ ] in March of 2016, The Recorded Video and Post to Facebook of Mr Mauwa Harris [ https://www.facebook.com/InTheMindway/videos/vb.1295702360/10206429424996523/?type=2&theater : May 9th 2016 ], This outgoing email written May 11th 2016 and assigned as community address #01D [ http://community.gruwup.net/01D : Projecting future time discussion meeting [ Whenever ] - adaptive thinking July 20th 2016, In October This Internal of Chesney Kleinjohn Apartment Tier #Conspiracy Tie would be linked to another tenant. This story being filed in my answer and defense of my eviction case that no one was paying attention to.

See Tweet::

James Driskill @Gruwup
6 Dec 2016
#ConspiracyExposed : This is my answer DEFENSE to Unlawful Detainer / Eviction Case From Denver CO
https://twitter.com/Gruwup/status/806364958317510656

It would not be until June and July of the following year that the source of this conspiracy hate and harassment would expose himself to be which I personally named in a Facebook live video recorded the day after events that occurred in front of the Colorado Health Network on July 5th and recorded in a facebook live the next day July 6th.
https://www.facebook.com/InTheMindway/videos/10209656249065108/

This after a facebook live was recorded on June 6th 2017 which Sammie Francher Reads the Every Single Business Card of the Colorado Health Network into the record of this video:
https://www.facebook.com/InTheMindway/videos/10209396034879916/

It would not be until after I leave town in July that on Glassdoor, these employee to employer reviews appear on the site.... showing exactly who was at fault, IT WAS NOT ME BUT THEM and STILL JB has not been given the facts because he does not wan to actually talk truth.

https://www.glassdoor.com/.../Colorado-Health-Network...

Melody Badwound-Wright, I will be in Denver the Week of June 6th 2018 to file a complaint with the Denver County District Attorney's Office in reference to #ConspiracyExposed in HIV/AIDS social services and the actors involved.

With Spoken Voice Text Narrative Interface....
[TXT] Gmail - PRELIMINARY STORY FOR A FILED COMPLAINT.html 30-Apr-2018 19:30 151K
http://webdomains.realuphuman.net/.../Gmail%20...
Manage
Image may contain: text
A Layout Image of Glassdoor reviews for Colorado Health Network is attached to this comment.   and a word definition clarification to "caddy" is also provided in this layout image.  These are given here for spoken voice narrative.


Colorado Health Network

3 reviews provided here.

Colorado Health Network Reviews

Updated February 17, 2018
4 reviews

Your trust is our top concern, so companies can't alter or remove reviews.

Employee Reviews

Sort: PopularRatingDate
Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
Doesn't Recommend
Neutral Outlook

I worked at Colorado Health Network full-time

Pros

The mission at CHN is good.

Cons

Very caddy work environment for the most part.

Advice to Management

Get to know employees better

----


3
When a person or group of people, usually friends, or sometimes in college sorority sisters, act very immature, don't ever escape the "high school mindset" such as getting caught up in stupid (caddy) drama that is relatively unimportant, are sometimes annoying, loud, obnoxious, materialistic, drunk, change their morals for the acceptance of others, act like they are "the shit" and above others in status who are not in that group, etc. things of that nature.
I can't stand that group of peoples' "caddy" attitudes. They are going no where in life until they realize that they need to grow up and stop acting so... "CADDY"!
by Cali Girl 3131 December 12, 2008


----


  • Helpful (2)

  • Former Employee - Client Services in Denver, CO
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook

    I worked at Colorado Health Network (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Case Managers are not micro-managed, occasionally drug companies will come in and bring free lunch, relaxed dress code, on a major bus line

    Cons

    Management is awful. They do not trust their employees with anything - not even tissues. If you want a box of tissues you have to go to upstairs and talk to the them. One person stores them in his office.

    They had a big "investigation" because two employees quit because of racism and discrimination within the organization - the "investigation" was "inconclusive". They had a meeting with all of the staff (that was announced 24 hrs prior). Regarding discrimination. It was said that we were diverse "we have one of everything". How can an organization thrive when a top official is racist?

    If you are a woman or person of color, it is very hard to move up in the org and be heard. If you are a cute, white male, you will do well in this company.

    Turnover is high!
    Show Less

    Advice to Management

    Maybe start with a little bit of respect (for clients and staff)?

    ----

    Helpful (1)

    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook

    I have been working at Colorado Health Network full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Brand new facility, friendly coworkers, easy access to downtown. Interviews are too easy. Great benefits. Benefits those less fortunate.

    Cons

    Oppressive leadership, disingenuous management, dishonest business practices. I really wan to like this place but the management could use some training. I have witnessed some dishonest business practices going on here. Toxic work environment. Pay is very low. Upper level management is very elitist, discriminating, and oppressive toward other staff.

    Advice to Management

    Take some training courses to learn how to perform your job better. Many may have landed in their current positions due to the Peter Principle. Do some house cleaning, see who actually contributes to the successful functioning of the company and trim the fat. Just because someone is fun outside of work and makes you laugh does not mean they are competent managers that need to be leading other people. Take a look in the mirror.

    ----

    Noteworthy of crossing of dates, I had to leave town Denver for my home town the Week of July 15th 2017.  That is where I am as I write this address today to the public.



    LikeShow more reactions
    · Reply · 56m
    James M Driskill
    James M Driskill The Date of the May 11th 2016 is a bit confused above. It is called Abusive Relationships, I want to pursue a lawsuit. http://meme.gruwup.net/.../Abusive%20Realtionships%20%20...Manage
    LikeShow more reactions
    · Reply · Remove Preview · 50m
    James M Driskill
    James M Driskill LinkedIn Help BFD=Big Fucking Deal #WordsToLiveBy
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YoYe9uKxK4...


    I will be filing a criminal complaint for abuse of power, collusion of invasion of privacy in regards to cyber-stocking my online activites against Organizations and persons involved.

    Colorado Health Network Denver Colorado AIDS Project-DCAP, Personally Named Actors of Conspiracy: Jamie Villalobos and Angela Keady.

    Rocky Mountain Cares [ http://www.rockymountaincares.org/ ] now known as AIDS Resource Center of Wisconsin - ARCW Joint Merger. Personally Named Actors of Conspiracy Cinamon Romero [ Case Manager ] and Shannon Southall [ Exec Director ]

    Chesney-Kleinjohn Apartments personally named Actors of Conspiracy Darrell Johnson. Property Manager.

    Pillar Property LLC I do believe is somewhat innocent however, Jennifer Mattock Property Manage accepted the false story telling record of me, my character, my reputation, liable and defamation claims of false story telling of Darrell Johnson of Chesney Kleinjohn and even perhaps in the director of Jamie Villalobos at that time of this False BAD TENANT Story Casting Story Telling of Collusion in an 11 month hate and harassment campaign to direct chaos and calamity into my life. That in effect that I have every contac at a viable remedy attempted to be followed through in August with a finally attempted business meeting between my case manager Cinamon Romero, Pillar Properties Property Manager Jennifer Mattock and Chesney Klienjohn Apartments Building Manager Darrell Johnson that failed to get the corrective Adaptive Thinking solutions to bring halt this ongoing hate and harassment campaign.

    In August, it was Darrell Johnson's rudeness that he had to stand in insolence of this business meeting to yell at me at the first to subvert authority of my very own business meeting. When Darrell Johnson Speaks. It is his way or the highway.... AND FOR THAT HE HAD TO VERBALLY APOLOGIZE TO THIS GROUP MEETING..... and he is the deliverance of the hate and harassment commands of Jamie Villalobos, I claim as Conspiracy Exposed. The documentation of this business meeting into the email record of @CinamonRomero of Rocky Mountain Cares along with the events of the bicycle prove collusion between parties of the social services agencies collective against me, a citizen resident. I will name Pillar Property LLC as an instrument agency of goal target eviction, for they indeed proceeded pursue this case even though I had informed attorney Rachel Griffin of Tschetter Hamrick Sulzer P.C. with my answer and defense filing to Eviction Case #2016C70601 filed on November 30th 2016 in HIV/AIDS Housing [ Denver Colorado AIDS Project-DCAP AIDS Healthcare Foundation Elton John AIDS Foundation Act Against AIDS ] on November 30th 2016, World Aids Day Eve. Metta World Peace and Magic Johnson Foundation [ via Los Angeles Lakers Contacts ] were even attempted to be interfaced to stop this hate! No Avail.

    --- My rights to CLAIM Criminal filing of complaint against responsible parties is my right that I hold the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, the absolute real truth, the absolute real up human truth, the absolute real up human moral truth to these circumstances. As documented by #WordsToLiveBy a plain unvarnished tale awaits court magistrate oversight to make the statements hold, Counsels Will Be Strong, Thy Reprimands Avail.
    Manage
    LikeShow more reactions
    · Reply · Remove Preview · 5m · Edited
    James M Driskill
    James M Driskill http://community.gruwup.net/Words-To-Live-By/

    Art thou dejected?

    Is thy mind o'ercast?
    To chase thy gloom,
    Go fix some weighty truth;
    Chain down some passion; do some generous good;
    Teach Ignorance to see, or Grief to smile;
    Correct thy friend; befriend thy greatest foe;
    Be just in all things; make amends
    For follies past, and, with warm heart,
    Forgive, and be forgiven. Let work not words
    Thy virtue prove. Go act as well as prate,
    And then thy counsels will be strong,
    Thy reprimands avail. —ANON

    THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the past ere they elude forever his grasp and weave them into a harmonious web to which the art preservative may give immortality. Therefore he who would rescue from fast gathering oblivion the deeds of a community and send them on to futurity in an imperishable record should deliver a plain unvarnished tale.
    Manage
    ...

    [Message clipped]